Insights

Embrace Change: Why You Need to Update Your Australian Employee Share Option Plan

Table of Contents

If you haven’t updated your employee share plan yet, now is the time to act. On 1st October 2022, significant amendments to the Corporations Act came into effect, altering the regulations governing employee share schemes (ESS) in Australia. These changes were designed to make it easier for startups and other businesses to attract and retain top talent by reducing the red tape and streamlining the regulatory requirements relating to the disclosure, licensing, advertising, anti-hawking, and on-sale requirements of shares, options and incentive rights offered under employee share plans. In this insight, we’ll explore some of the key features of the new ESS regime and explain why updating your share plan is crucial for your company’s success.

Simplifying Compliance

The updated ESS regime cuts through many of the complexities that previously surrounded the issuance of financial products and services, providing relief for companies using employee share plans. While the simplified compliance regime applies to companies of all sizes, it is especially useful for startups and smaller businesses. By complying with the new provisions, startups and scale-ups can offer a range of securities including options, shares and incentive rights to a greater pool of participants than previously possible without needing to issue a prospectus or hold an Australian financial services license.

Expanded Eligibility

Under the new regime, the scope of eligible participants has expanded significantly. Offers can now be made to current or prospective directors, employees, or service providers, regardless of their employment status (part-time, full-time, or casual). Additionally, offers can extend to certain family members and controlled body corporates of primary participants. This widened pool of eligible participants opens up new opportunities for companies to engage and motivate their teams.

Streamlined Disclosure

While the new ESS regime has streamlined disclosure requirements, those requirements are less burdensome than the traditional disclosure obligations under the Corporations Act. The new ESS disclosure obligations are also less onerous, particularly for unlisted bodies than under previous relief provisions which applied under Class Orders (CO14/1000 and CO 14/1002) (see further below on this point). With its simplified compliance obligations, reliance on the new regime is an attractive option for companies looking to incentivise and reward their employees, directors, and other eligible participants.

Enhanced Flexibility

The new ESS regime embraces flexibility by differentiating between offers for ESS securities requiring monetary payment and those not. The new regime also works alongside existing disclosure exemptions under the Corporations Act including the small-scale offering, senior manager, and sophisticated investor exemptions. This means companies now have various alternative pathways to choose from to avoid the burdensome traditional disclosure obligations under the Corporations Act. This in turn means businesses can tailor their ESS offerings on a participant-by-participant basis according to their unique needs.

The risks of getting it wrong

Before the introduction of the new ESS regime, class orders [CO 14/1000] Employee incentive schemes: Listed bodies and ASIC Class Order [CO 14/1001] Employee incentive schemes: Unlisted bodies (Class Orders) provided regulatory relief from certain obligations under the Corporations Act. However, those Class Orders now only apply to ESS offers made on or before 1 March 2023 and accepted before 1 April 2024.

Consequently, companies should revamp their employee share plans to ensure they are eligible for relief under the new ESS regime. Getting it wrong can have serious consequences: companies can be found to have fallen foul of their disclosure obligations under the Corporations Act, relief under the ESS regime can be revoked and directors may be held personally liable. Due to the way the new ESS regime intersects with existing exemptions under the Corporations Act, those risks may not always be avoided simply by relying on the small-scale offering, senior manager, and sophisticated investor exemptions. For a deeper understanding of how listed entities are falling foul of the new ESS regime, see this detailed article: How Listed Entities Are Falling Foul of the New ESS Regime

The new ESS regime presents a golden opportunity for companies to revitalise their employee share plans and gain a competitive edge in attracting and retaining top talent. However, to be eligible to rely on the new regime and to mitigate the risks of getting it wrong, companies need to refresh their employee share plans. Contact us to learn how to embrace these changes and propel your business to new heights.

Author

  • Kelly is a corporate and commercial lawyer dedicated to the Australian startup ecosystem. She specializes in capital raising, governance, and regulatory compliance, helping businesses from early-stage to international scaleups, navigate complex commercial transactions. Kelly is a member of the Australian Law Council SME Committee and holds a particular interest in climate-related regulation.

    View all posts

More Posts

ESOPs and Overseas Employees: Why Multi-National Share Plans Become Expensive for Australian Companies

For Australian companies, an ESOP, employee share scheme or share plan can be a great way to attract and retain staff by giving them a future stake in the business. But the position becomes much more complicated when the company wants to offer options to employees based overseas. What looks like a simple extension of an Australian employee share option plan can quickly become an expensive and time-consuming compliance exercise. Once you move into the world of multi-national share plans or global share plans, you are no longer just dealing

How Convertible Notes, SAFEs and Warrants Work Together in the Capital Raising Stack

In Australia, across early and growth-stage funding, convertible notes, SAFEs and warrants are rarely used in isolation. They are typically layered over time – sometimes deliberately, sometimes opportunistically, as founders raise capital in stages before a larger priced equity round. Having examined each instrument individually in the earlier articles in this series, it is equally important to understand how each instrument operates together. The practical consequences of capital raising often emerge not from the terms of a single instrument, but from the way multiple instruments interact within a company’s capital

right, advocacy, lex-4703926.jpg

Startup Warrants Explained: Key Terms, Dilution and How Warrants Work in Startup Financing

In startup and venture financing, a startup warrant is a right, but not an obligation, to purchase shares in a company at a predetermined price (known as the strike price) within a specified period. Warrants are often issued alongside other investment instruments to provide additional upside to investors or strategic partners. They are commonly used in venture debt arrangements, strategic investment transactions and advisory agreements to help align incentives between investors and the company. Warrants are a familiar feature of startup and scaleup financing, but they are often less well

Understanding Simple Agreements for Future Equity

Simple Agreement for Future Equity (SAFE) is a financing instrument used in startup capital raising that gives an investor the right to receive shares in a future equity round if specified events occur. SAFEs allow startups to raise capital quickly while deferring valuation and share issuance until a later funding round. SAFEs have become a common feature of early-stage capital raising in Australia, particularly at pre-seed and seed stage. They are often described as a faster, simpler alternative to convertible notes, and are designed to help companies raise capital without